Skip to content

Conversation

eserilev
Copy link
Member

@eserilev eserilev commented Sep 2, 2025

Issue Addressed

#7950

Proposed Changes

Skip column gossip verification logic during block production as its redundant and potentially computationally expensive.

@eserilev eserilev added das Data Availability Sampling v8.0.0-rc.0 Q3 2025 release for Fusaka on Holesky labels Sep 2, 2025
@eserilev eserilev added ready-for-review The code is ready for review optimization Something to make Lighthouse run more efficiently. labels Sep 2, 2025
@jimmygchen jimmygchen self-assigned this Sep 3, 2025
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Some required checks have failed. Could you please take a look @eserilev? 🙏

@mergify mergify bot added waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. and removed ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Sep 4, 2025
@jimmygchen
Copy link
Member

@eserilev the sync job is failing, doesn't feel like your change would trigger this, but interestingly both fullnode and supernode are failing to sync, and stuck at SyncTransition, would you mind checking the logs to see what happened?
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/actions/runs/17475882997/job/49636337462?pr=7973

Copy link
Member

@jimmygchen jimmygchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just added a minor comment but i think we're close to merging this.

@jimmygchen jimmygchen removed their assignment Sep 9, 2025
@eserilev eserilev added ready-for-review The code is ready for review and removed waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. labels Sep 9, 2025
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Some required checks have failed. Could you please take a look @eserilev? 🙏

@mergify mergify bot added waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. and removed ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Sep 9, 2025
@eserilev
Copy link
Member Author

eserilev commented Sep 9, 2025

For the 300s sync tests, I found it a bit weird that the non vc nodes are supposed to sleep for 5min but the test also times out in 5min. I've increased the timeout threshold to 6min. Not sure if thats the underlying issue here, but it feels like a step in the right direction either way

nevermind, I see that the timeout is only relevant once the nodes are restarted

Copy link
Member

@jimmygchen jimmygchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, the added check looks good to me! Thanks

@jimmygchen jimmygchen added ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. and removed waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. labels Sep 10, 2025
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 10, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: checks failed.

The merge conditions cannot be satisfied due to failing checks:

You can check the last failing draft PR here: #8024.

You may have to fix your CI before adding the pull request to the queue again.
If you update this pull request, to fix the CI, it will automatically be requeued once the queue conditions match again.
If you think this was a flaky issue instead, you can requeue the pull request, without updating it, by posting a @mergifyio requeue comment.

mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
@jimmygchen
Copy link
Member

@eserilev http api tests are failing, looks like the tests need an update - we no longer expect a gossip data column failure, so the assertion needs to be updated for Fulu
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/actions/runs/17607093762/job/50020181539

Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 10, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: checks failed.

The merge conditions cannot be satisfied due to failing checks:

You can check the last failing draft PR here: #8025.

You may have to fix your CI before adding the pull request to the queue again.
If you update this pull request, to fix the CI, it will automatically be requeued once the queue conditions match again.
If you think this was a flaky issue instead, you can requeue the pull request, without updating it, by posting a @mergifyio requeue comment.

@jimmygchen
Copy link
Member

@mergify requeue

Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 10, 2025

requeue

☑️ This pull request is already queued

Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 10, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: pull request manually updated.

The pull request #7973 has been manually updated.

If you want to requeue this pull request, you can post a @mergifyio requeue comment.

mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
@mergify mergify bot merged commit caa1df6 into sigp:unstable Sep 10, 2025
37 checks passed
PoulavBhowmick03 pushed a commit to PoulavBhowmick03/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2025
)

sigp#7950


  Skip column gossip verification logic during block production as its redundant and potentially computationally expensive.


Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri-Levi <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <[email protected]>
kevaundray pushed a commit to kevaundray/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2025
)

  Skip column gossip verification logic during block production as its redundant and potentially computationally expensive.

Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri-Levi <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <[email protected]>
jtraglia pushed a commit to jtraglia/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025
)

sigp#7950


  Skip column gossip verification logic during block production as its redundant and potentially computationally expensive.


Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri-Levi <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <[email protected]>

Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
das Data Availability Sampling optimization Something to make Lighthouse run more efficiently. ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. v8.0.0-rc.0 Q3 2025 release for Fusaka on Holesky
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants